Returning to a White Immigration Policy

Once upon a time in a land far, far away (alright, more like 55 years ago) the USA had one of the strictest immigration policies known to man. In addition to capping the number of people who could come in they also made it nearly impossible for non-Nordics to get one of those coveted spots. Even Southern Europeans weren’t considered “white” enough.

Now we are the complete opposite, letting in anything, even if it is another savage African that we don’t need. So is the solution to this quandary just a complete and utter immigration moratorium? No one let in for say a hundred years? Again, that would not be a pro-white immigration policy.

Now before you try to flay me alive for my supposed “heresy” lets consider what the purpose of a white immigration policy is. The entire reason for such a policy is simply to keep our nation majority European (and for many people, Northern European). Given the way our nation is going in terms of race that means to achieve that end we need to boost our white population.

Given that our women aren’t exactly willing to spread their legs and do their duty (we are below replacement rate at this point for white births in America) that means we can’t reproduce our way out of this. This means that we have to get more whites from some where else.

So where exactly can we get them, and what exactly qualifies as “white”? To answer the second question we basically have two answers, the Anglo-Saxon answer is “one drop of anything else and it ain’t white, that includes Southern or Eastern Europeans”. The Southern European answer meanwhile is, “if it is majority European and has little to no black or Asian blood its white”.

The first question meanwhile depends sharply on which answer you choose for the second question. If we go the Anglo-Saxon definition for example that basically means only Austria, Australia, Belgium, Britain, Canada, Germany, (parts of)France, The Netherlands, New Zealand, Scandinavia, Switzerland, and if we are feeling generous the Czech Republic.

With the other answer we can basically recruit from all of Europe and Latin America, subject to a color exam of course. And a background and education check while we are at it.

As for which is the better choice for America I am inclined to go with the Southern European option, the reality is that Northern Europe is no longer brimming with excess whites for us to bring in. The time for 100% white blood purity has passed, it is time to be a little bit more “liberal” on the subject (I know, curse word).

Done correctly we will have enough of a white population to successfully pressurize the Hispanic population, rendering them into the Italians and Greeks of yesteryear. That would be for heritage America the best possible outcome that could be reasonably expected. Alas such a policy will require an executive willing to do it, Trump is inching closer to this idea but he’s still far off from it.